|
TALKING POINTS FOR RADIO AND TV
GUEST SUGGESTION: Contact: Clarice Z. Smith Press Officer, Manhattan Institute, 212-599-7000, Ext. 318 csmith@manhattan-institute.org
Ross Sandler & David Schoenbrod, authors of
Democracy by Decree: What Happens When Courts Run Government (Yale University Press, 2003)
As publicity efforts for Democracy by Decree continue, please consider the following "talking points" for any radio, television and print interviews involving the authors Ross Sandler and David Schoenbrod.
***
Institutional reform litigation promises to protect the powerless by making politicians cede some of their power to apolitical judges and public interest lawyers. In reality, people suffer when litigation denies local and state officials the flexibility to change outdated and impractical policies.
- Through judicial decrees, courts have increasingly supplanted governors and mayors in running many important state and local services such as special education, welfare and foster care.
- Despite the conventional wisdom that decrees put the judge in charge of government agencies, judges usually turn over operative control of the mandates to a group composed of plaintiffs’ attorneys, court-appointed functionaries and unelected officials.
- This “controlling group” often acts in secrecy and directs the programs outside democratically accountable channels of government. The decrees written and administered by the controlling group are highly detailed and often stay in force for decades.
- Since decrees are notoriously difficult to modify, agency managers can’t adapt to changing circumstances and the quality of public services declines.
In Democracy by Decree by Ross Sandler and David Schoenbrod explain how the controlling groups took charge and show how judges can protect individual rights without letting control groups supplant democratically accountable government. Their proposals focus on:
- Methods to limit court decrees to correcting violations.
- Granting wide latitude to officials working in good faith to meet legal obligations.
- Allowing officials to modify decrees when they have a good reason to do so.
- Term limits on judges supervising decrees.
- Term limits on decrees unless plaintiffs can show that the violations of law persist.
Democracy by Decree urges us to re-evaluate our blind faith in courts, judges, and lawyers to cure social problems without democratic accountability. Until we face the reality of the system we’ve created, real solutions will evade courts and elected officials.
|